CYPRESS AUTOMATION TESTING SERVICES BUILT FOR RELEASE CONFIDENCE

You'll see tangible value within 7-14 days when we deliver your first automated critical flows running in CI with visible reporting. Complete suite stabilization with full coverage of priority journeys typically takes 30 days including framework setup, integration, and operationalization.

Yes, flaky test stabilization is one of our core services. We've helped teams reduce flake rates from 35% to under 3% by systematically addressing root causes: timing issues, test isolation failures, brittle selectors, and environmental inconsistencies.

Yes. We implement comprehensive CI/CD integration including PR smoke test pipelines, nightly regression suites, environment-specific configurations, and reporting dashboards. We configure which tests block releases (critical flows) and which generate warnings (lower-priority issues).

We implement comprehensive test data strategies combining API seeding, database fixtures, and cleanup automation to ensure every test has the exact data it needs without interference from other tests. Each test owns its complete state setup and teardown.

Yes, we use Cypress's cy.intercept() strategically, only when it improves test determinism without hiding legitimate integration risks that should be caught before production.

We stub external third-party services with unpredictable behavior: payment gateways with rate limits, email delivery services, SMS providers, and analytics platforms. For your own APIs, we prefer real integration testing with seeded test data to catch actual contract issues.

Yes, we provide Selenium-to-Cypress migration services, though we don't recommend direct one-to-one translation. Cypress enables different patterns (command chaining, automatic waiting) that make literal translations suboptimal. We design the migration to take advantage of Cypress's native capabilities.

We architect Cypress frameworks around five core principles: separation of concerns, reusability, maintainability, clear conventions, and enforced standards. This includes custom commands, page objects or action patterns, shared utilities, and ESLint rules that prevent brittle selectors.

We track six core metrics that together provide complete visibility into test suite health: flake rate, runtime trend, pass rate, failure taxonomy, coverage of critical flows, and defect leakage. These are reviewed weekly and reported monthly with trend analysis.

Clear ownership prevents the most common cause of test suite decay, failures that nobody feels responsible for fixing. We establish ownership through RACI matrices and triage workflows documented during framework implementation. Every failure has an assigned owner and resolution timeline.

Stakeholders receive three reporting layers: real-time CI dashboards (Allure/HTML/Cypress Cloud), weekly health summaries with KPI trends and action items, and monthly strategic reviews with ROI analysis and coverage roadmaps—each designed for different audiences and decision-making needs.

Our Maintenance & Scale service provides ongoing ownership of test suite health through weekly monitoring, systematic fixes, quarterly refactoring, and controlled test expansion with quality gates. This ensures the suite remains reliable and valuable as your application evolves.

UI changes are the most common cause of test maintenance overhead. We prevent a significant portion of UI-change-driven breakage through durable selector strategies (data-testid attributes with ESLint enforcement) and separation of test logic from UI implementation details.

Parallel execution is essential for keeping feedback time under 5 minutes as test suites grow. We design parallelization strategies based on your CI infrastructure, suite size, and budget constraints—whether using Cypress Cloud's built-in parallelization or self-hosted runners with custom load balancing.